The petitioner's counsel voluntarily abandoned the criminal miscellaneous writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed, leaving the petitioner with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17863 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Mariyam Khatoon @ Sapna And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, states that he does not want to press the writ petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 2.12.2022 ML
Digitally signed by MUNNA LAL Date: 2022.12.03 10:15:09 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Mariyam Khatoon @ Sapna And 3 Others
State Of U P And 2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Narendra Kumar Johari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
