Arpit Maurya and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated that a subsequent development rendered the matter moot.
The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated that a subsequent development rendered the matter moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1654 of 2022
Petitioner :- Arpit Maurya And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Srivastava,Prabhu Narain Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Counsel for the petitioners states that this petition has been rendered infructuous by a subsequent development.
In view of the statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.2.2022 Meenu
Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.02.25 10:25:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arpit Maurya And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court