The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed in 2006. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as more than 15 years had elapsed without the petitioner appearing to press the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15262 of 2006
Petitioner :- Vashisht Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Sahai Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Amar Nath Singh,C.K. Rai
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
List has been revised. None present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent is present.
The present petition is of the year 2006. More than 15 years have already been elapsed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, if cause of action still survives, then petitioner may approach this Court to recall this order.
Order Date :- 4.8.2022 Abhishek Singh
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SINGH Date: 2022.08.05 16:58:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vashisht Singh
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
