The High Court dismissed a criminal revisional petition as infructuous after the respondents filed a charge sheet, rendering the petitioners' challenge devoid of practical utility as recorded by counsel.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the charge sheet had been filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1440 of 2022
Petitioner :- Jayhind @ Jeetu Raykawar And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Learned A.G.A. states that after investigation, the police has filed a charge sheet bearing No.321 of 2021 on 26.12.2021.
In view of the statement so made, it is clear and is admitted by counsel for the petitioners that the petition has, for all practical purposes, been rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 21.2.2022 Meenu
Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.02.23 16:40:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jayhind @ Jeetu Raykawar And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
