This order records that the petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition has become infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12989 of 2021
Petitioner :- Umesh Chandra Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tribhuwan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Counsel for the petitioner states that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments.
In view of the statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.1.2022
Priyanka
Umesh Chandra Yadav
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
