Petitioner's writ petition for premature probation release under U.P. Prisoners Release on Probation Act was dismissed as infructuous due to absence of counsel.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12911 of 2018
Petitioner :- Dr. Siyaram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy Home And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Kumar Srivastava,Mohd Salman
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
None appears for the petitioner to press this petition.
It transpires from the record that the matter pertains to release the petitioner prematurely on License under Form-A under Section 2 of U.P. Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938.
Since none is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition in order to inform whether the petition survives or not, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
However, it is open for the petitioner to move an appropriate application within two months from today, if the matter survives.
[Saroj Yadav, J.] [Ramesh Sinha, J.]
Order Date :- 9.3.2022 lakshman
Digitally signed by LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA Date: 2022.03.10 18:40:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dr. Siyaram
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Saroj Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
