Afzal Idrisi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court examined the opening of a Class A history sheet against the petitioner. Relying on Section 228 of Police Regulations, the court held that since the offences did not pertain to Class A, the impugned order could not be sustained and was therefore quashed.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order opening a Class A history sheet is hereby quashed.