Criminal miscellaneous writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as parties failed to appear for 16 years, making the matter infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 102 of 2006
Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Agrawal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,V.S. Rajpoot
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case has been called out in the revised list. None appears either on behalf of the petitioner or respondent no.2, even in the revised call. However, learned AGA is present.
The matter is of the year 2006 and more than 16 years have passed. It appears that either by efflux of time the matter has become infructuous or the parties have lost their interest.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 12.5.2022 SKM
Digitally signed by SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.05.14 14:19:30 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Kumar Agrawal
State Of U.P.
Sameer Jain
Shravana Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
