This order dismisses a writ petition seeking investment direction for fair investigation as infructuous after the chargesheet was submitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10105 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Anjana Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gajendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. Hon'ble Syed Waiz Mian,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent authorities to ensure fair, impartial and proper investigation of the Case Crime no.100 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police StationKokharaj, District Kaushambi.
On the matter being taken up today, learned AGA has submitted that in the present matter the chargesheet has been submitted and as such the reliefs claimed in the writ petition no more survives.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.8.2022 Shivangi
Digitally signed by SHIVANGI YADAV Date: 2022.08.26 10:32:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Anjana Devi
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
Syed Waiz Mian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
