Disposed
Jawahar and Others v. State
Allahabad HCCRLA/3439/1984
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad held that the criminal appeal abated due to the death of appellant Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and dismissed the appeal as disposed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal stood abated and was disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 325
¶2
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
¶3
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3439 of 1984
¶4
Jawahar and others
¶5
.....Appellants
¶6
v/s
¶7
State of U.P. .....Respondent Through :- Mr. Syed Ali Murtaza, Additional Government Advocate
¶8
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
¶9
ORDER
¶10
- Vide report dated March 14, 2018 submitted by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat appellants no. 1 to 3, namely, Jawahar, Raghubir and Braham Singh are reported to have died. Vide another report dated March 25, 2021 submitted by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat the appellant no. 4, namely, Raj Pal, is reported to have died. The appeal, therefore, stands abated.
¶11
- The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as abated.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Jawahar and others
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/3439/1984
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court