Badan Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against conviction and one-year rigorous imprisonment under Arms Act upheld. Due to 36-year pendency, sentence modified to term already undergone.
What did the court decide?
Conviction confirmed; sentence reduced to the period already undergone by the appellant.
What the court decided
1
Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1206 of 1986
Appellant :- Badan Singh and two others Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Kundan Singh,Girish Chandra Saxena,Hari Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
- This appeal arises out of impugned judgement and order dated 18.03.1986 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Etah in Sessions Trial No. 2 of 1985 with connected Sessions Trial No.5 of 1985, under Section 25 Arms Act, Police Station Sahavar, District Etah, whereby accused-appellant has been convicted under Section 25 Arms Act and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment.
- The prosecution story in brief is that on 30.5.1985 at about 10:30 p.m. the appellant no.2- Lalaman along with co-accused Badan Singh and Shyam Lal were making preparation for committing dacoity and had assembled for the aforesaid purpose with deadly weapons and in prosecution of common object of that assembly they committed rioting and also fired upon the police personnels with an intention to cause their murder. They were arrested on spot and a factory-made pistol with six live cartridges, 12 bore, country-made pistol, 12 bore with five live cartridges, 12 bore and one desi pistol 12 bore along with three live cartridges, 12 bore were recovered from the accused, Badan Singh, Shyam lal and Lalaman respectively. However, no injury was caused to any of the police personnel in the said occurrence. The fard of arrest and recovery was prepared on spot and FIR was lodged. After
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court should be modified considering the long pendency of proceedings.
Whether adequate and special reasons exist to impose a sentence of less than two years.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Badan Singh
- appellant
Lalman
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1206/1986
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court