Review application dismissed as the underlying writ petition was dismissed for filing a claim under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act after the statutory limit. Court held further directions on time-bar issue were futile.
Application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.4
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 56 of 2022
(Arising out of Writ-C No.18145 of 2021)
Zaheer and others
..Applicants
Through :- Mr. Hira Lal Singh (Kushwaha), Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
..Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 04.03.2022 AHA/Rakesh
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application u/s 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was filed beyond the time period provided.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Zaheer and others
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
