Order dismissing a stay civil application seeking review of an earlier order. The court rejected arguments raised in the garb of review after the original counsel was absent and noted a significant filing delay.
Review application dismissed outright.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 1
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 376 of 2022 (O&M)
(Arising out of Writ C No. 10154 of 2022)
Smt. Mithlesh Devi and others .....Applicants
Through :- Mr. N.K. Bhatnagar, Advocate with Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others ..Opposite Parties Through :- Mr. Ramanand Pandey, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, JUDGE
ORDER
(J.J. Munir) (Rajesh Bindal) Judge Chief Justice
Allahabad
12.09.2022 Manish Himwan/P.Sri.
Whether the order is speaking : Yes Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by MANISH HIMWAN Date: 2022.09.15 16:14:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether arguments raised in the garb of review application without preceding counsel being heard can be permitted.
Whether the delay of 46 days in filing the review application warrants dismissal.
Smt. Mithlesh Devi and others
Rajesh Bindal
J.J. Munir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
