The revision was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the counsel for the revisionist filed in 1995.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 354 of 1995
Revisionist :- Surendra Yadav Opposite Party :- Branch Manager Counsel for Revisionist :- A.P. Srivastava
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is not present.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 16.9.2022 P Kesari
Digitally signed by PRACHI KESARWANI Date: 2022.09.16 15:55:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Yadav
Branch Manager
SARAL SRIIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
