Civil Revision dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist was unrepresented even when the case was called in the revised list.
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 318 of 1999
Revisionist :- M/S Sarmukh Goods Cariersand Another Opposite Party :- U.P.S.S.C.Ltd. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- D.P. Singh,Manu Saxena,P.K. Dubey
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
None for the revisionist even when the case is called in revised list.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 2.9.2022 SS
Digitally signed by SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2022.09.03 13:16:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Sarmukh Goods Cariasands Another
U.P.S.S.C.Ltd. And Another
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
