In Civil Revision No. 179 of 2002, this court dismissed the revision for want of prosecution due to the absence of the revisionists' counsel to press the matter, thereby vacating any interim order.
Revision dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 179 of 2002
Revisionist :- Giridhar Gopal Khandelwal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- D.C.Mathur Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sudhir Agarwal
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the revisionists to press this revision. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 9.9.2022 NS
Digitally signed by NITIN KUMAR Date: 2022.09.10 11:27:35 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Giridhar Gopal Khandelwal And Another
State of U.P. and Another
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
