The High Court dismissed the civil revision because the revisionist failed to appear, invoking provisions for deemed service and want of prosecution.
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 118 of 2004
Revisionist :- Babu Singhdeceased Thru. L.Rs Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector And Others
Counsel for Revisionist :- Manoj Mishra
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
As per office report dated 26.02.2022, N.E.C. was sent to the revisionist Nos.1/1 to 1/4 by R.P.A.D. Neither undelivered cover of the registered post nor any acknowledgement has been received back. Hence notices on revisionist Nos.1/1 to 1/4 are deemed to be sufficient.
No one appears on behalf of the revisionists.
This revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
It shall be open for the revisionists to file recall application, if the revision survives for consideration.
Order Date :- 2.3.2022 Ruchi
Digitally signed by RUCHI AGRAHARI Date: 2022.03.02 16:12:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Babu Singh (deceased) Thru. L.Rs
State Of U.P.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
