The vengeance court dismissed a contempt application due to absence in court and apparent compliance with the writ order or loss of party interest, allowing future revival.
Application dismissed; liberty granted to file application for revival if relief survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 572 of 2015
Applicant :- Deepak Yadav Opposite Party :- Sr. Arun Kumar Yadav And 3 Ors Counsel for Applicant :- Man Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised. Nobody is present.
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of the writ Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
However, in case, any relief still survives in the present application, the applicant/applicants shall be at liberty to file application for revival of the present application.
Order Date :- 2.9.2022
Swati
Digitally signed by SWATI PATHAK Date: 2022.09.06 09:49:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Yadav
Sr. Arun Kumar Yadav
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
