Rajendra Kumar Pandey v. Sri S.Rajalingam, D.M.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court heard a contempt application by the applicant alleging non-compliance of a writ court order regarding his retirement benefits. The opposing party filed an affidavit of compliance showing the benefit was sanctioned on the date the representation was decided, rendering the application infructuous.
What did the court decide?
No cause of action survives for the contempt application; the same is consigned to the record.