The Civil Contempt Application (No. 1969 of 2014) was dismissed as infructuous. The court noted the record suggested compliance with its order or a loss of interest by the parties. An option was retained to revive the application if a cause of action survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1969 of 2014
Applicant :- Kr. Poonam Srivastava Siddhartha Opposite Party :- Mohit Agrawal Deputy I.G. Of Police Estb. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Nagendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised.
Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant/applicants, whereas Sri Ramsh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel is present for the State.
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of this Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
However, in case, any cause of action still survives in the present application, the applicant/applicants shall be at liberty to file application for revival of the present application.
Order Date :- 30.3.2022 S.K.
Digitally signed by SWEETY KANOJIA Date: 2022.03.31 15:55:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poonam Srivastava Siddhartha
Mohit Agrawal
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
