In a contempt application regarding potential disobedience of a 2002 Writ Petition order, no applicants were present. Finding compliance or loss of interest noted, the applicant was dismissed with liberty to seek recall.
Application dismissed; liberty granted to move for recall if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1118 of 2012
Applicant :- Mohd. Imtiyaz And Others Opposite Party :- Vipin Kumar Sharma Addl. Dir. Of Police Training And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Pratap Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,SC
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicants.
The applicants are before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the judgement and order dated 26.8.2002 passed in Writ Petition No. 35669 of 2002.
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of the writ Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
However, the applicants will be at liberty to move an application for recall of the order in case cause of action still survives.
Order Date :- 28.7.2022 nd
Digitally signed by NISITH DEY Date: 2022.08.11 12:30:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to initiate contempt proceedings for willful disobedience of the judgement passed on 26.8.2002.
Mohd. Imtiyaz
Prakash Padia
Nisith Dey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
