Rahul Sarswat v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail cancellation application rejected as not pressed by the applicant upon the informant's request.
What did the court decide?
Application rejected as not pressed.
Bail cancellation application rejected as not pressed by the applicant upon the informant's request.
Application rejected as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 226 of 2022
Applicant :- Rahul Sarswat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amish Kumar Srivastava,Rajesh Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Shri Amish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant-informant of the case does not want to press this bail cancellation application and the same may be rejected as not pressed.
The bail cancellation application is, accordingly rejected as not pressed.
Order Date :- 19.11.2022 Sumaira
Digitally signed by SUMAIRA AQUIL Date: 2022.11.21 13:16:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul Sarswat
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court