The High Court dismissed the bail cancellation application as infructuous by the efflux of time, noting the absence of parties to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 207 of 2020
Applicant :- Rahul Rashmikant. Gabhawala Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nikhil Kumar,Prashant Kanha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Brajesh Nath Rai,Rahul Mishra
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of the parties to press the present application. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
By the efflux of time, the present application become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the above, the present application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.12.2022 Sachin/-
Digitally signed by SACHIN TIWARI Date: 2022.12.19 12:14:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul Rashmikant Gabhawala
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
