Bail cancellation application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear in Court No. 74. Counsel for the opposite party was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 162 of 2021
Applicant :- Abhinav Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Diwan Saifullah Khan,Abhishek Ankur Chaurasia
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jai Prakash Yadav
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Case called out in revised list. Counsel for the opposite party is present.
None appeared on behalf of applicant.
The bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 1.12.2022 Meenu
Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.12.02 12:48:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abhinav Yadav
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
