Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that a first information report has been lodged before the aforesaid police station in the above noted sections against nine nominated accused persons and not against the applicant. He next sought to argue that the name of the applicant stood surfaced on the basis of statement of Sri Kunal. Learned counsel has sought to argue that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the case in question. The applicant has not committed any offence. The recovery which has been sought to be shown from the applicant is planted one. There is no independent witness. Learned counsel has drawn the attention of the Court towards paragraph 9 of the bail application so as to contend that the applicant possesses criminal history of five cases being Case Crime No. 232 of 2021, 225 of 2021, 224 of 2021, 302 of 2021, the said cases are post lodging of the present FIR. Learned counsel has further argued that so far as Case Crime No. 72 of 2017 is concerned, the applicant stands released on bail. Learned counsel has further sought to argue that so far as Case Crime No. 196 of 2016 and 195 of 2017 under Excise Act are concerned, the same are become totally irrelevant so far as they are sought to be counted in the parameters of criminal history and so far Case Crime No. 158 of 2016, under Sections 147, 323, 325, 504, 506 read with Section 3/1 SC/ST Act is
