Hon'ble Ali Zamin, J. granted bail to the applicant in a case under Sections 8/21 N.D.P.S. Act following recovery of 144g alprazolam powder, imposing strict conditions regarding attendance, evidence tampering, and proclamation consequences.
The applicant released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 671 of 2022
Applicant :- Danish Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.569 of 2021, under Section 8/21 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Saharanpur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to the FIR version 144 gram alprazolam powder alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. He further submits that there is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. He further submits that there is no evidence on record to connect the recovered material to be alprazolam powder. He further submits that applicant has criminal history of 02 cases, which has been explained in para 13 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. He further submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. It is next submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 8.11.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that 144 gram alprazolam powder has been recovered from the possession of the applicant, therefore, he does not deserve any benevolence.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, recovered material, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Danish involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence and pressurize the witnesses during trial.
(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 27.1.2022
m.a.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant Danish is entitled to bail in a case under Sections 8/21 N.D.P.S. Act given the recovery of alprazolam powder from his possession.
What conditions shall be imposed upon granting bail to ensure the applicant does not tamper with evidence or flee judicial process.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Danish
Ali Zamin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ali Zamin
