Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the payer for bail and contended that the role of causing fire arm injuries has been assigned to the applicant since beginning and in the FIR although, it is stated that the fire opened by the applicant hit the son of informant but as there are as many as 7-8 persons, therefore, due to mistake informant mentioned this fact in the FIR. Learned AGA further contended that in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. informant herself rectified her mistake and in the statement of Pooja, it is also specifically mentioned that fire opened by the applicant caused injuries to Pooja, Aakash and Arjun and not to Jagannath and, therefore, if such mistake has been made in the FIR then on this ground alone applicant cannot be benefited. Learned AGA further alleged that the co-accused Prem was enlarged on bail only due to the reason that initially there was no role of causing fire arm injuries attributed to him and further there was also an evidence that on the pointing out of the applicant, country made pistol was recovered, therefore, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.
