Allowed

Arvind Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Dec 2022BAIL/55290/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the applicant in a prosecution under Sections 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act charging him with possession of 15 kg of Ganja. The prayer was allowed subject to furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties, along with specific conditions regarding court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail subject to personal bond and two local sureties with conditions of attendance and no adjournments.

Arvind Kumar Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 90

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55290 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Aman Tiwari, Advocate holding the brief of Sri Manish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant- Arvind Kumar with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 213 of 2022, under Sections 8/20 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station-G.R.P. Cantt, District-Agra, during the pendency of the trial.

¶7

It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant or his pointing out. It is further submitted that 15 k.g. of 'Ganja' are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. It is submitted that the alleged recovery of 15 k.g. Ganja is below commercial quantity. There is no compliance of Sections 50 and 52 of the N.D.P.S. Act and also no report of Forensic Science Laboratory on the basis of which it can be said that the alleged recovered item was a contraband. There is also no independent witness. It is further contended that coaccused, namely, Brajkishor has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.12.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 55229 of 2022 and the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no criminal history. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 13.08.2022.

¶8

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but he could not dispute the factual submissions as urged by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Considering the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment as well as the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, let the applicant involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶14

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶15

Order Date :- 9.12.2022 SK Srivastava

¶16

Digitally signed by SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.12.12 11:49:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Arvind Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sehwaz Vs State of U.P.

Neha @ Sadhna Singh Nurse Vs State of U.P. through Secretary Home

Irfan Vs State of U.P.

Chhotu Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Vs State of U.P.

Vikram Sharma Vs State of U.P.