It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. It is further submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR. During the investigation police has arrested four accused persons including the present applicant and the informant identified the three accused person, but not recognized the present applicant. It is also submitted that the specification of snatching of alleged gold and silver items have not been mentioned in the FIR when as a matter of fact specification of alleged recovered items has been mentioned in the alleged recovery memo, therefore, it is not discernible as to what items have been snatched from the informant and what items have been recovered from the applicant, which makes the entire prosecution case doubtful. It is further submitted that the applicant has criminal history of four cases, which have been explained in para- 10 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 13.08.2022.
