It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that for the alleged incident dated 01.08.2022 at 22:00 hour., the present first information report has been lodged on 02.08.2022 at 20:17 hour i.e. delay of 22 hours in lodging of the same for which no plausible explanation has been given, which makes the prosecution case doubtful. It is further submitted that in the statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., the victim has stated that she was having love and affection with the applicant and as her parents trying to solemnized her marriage against her will she left her house and went to Lucknow where they solemnized their marriage in a temple and further she stated that nothing wrong has been done with her by the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant, therefore, submits that the parties are consenting. Apart from the above, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no evidence on the basis of which it can be said that the applicant has taken the victim along with him forcefully without her consent. Therefore, no case under Section 363 I.P.C. is made out against the applicant. It is further submitted that the
