Allowed

Vishal v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC4 Nov 2022BAIL/48080/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to Vishal in a case under Sections 392, 411 IPC, directing the trial court to release him on personal bond and two sureties subject to specific undertakings regarding court attendance and evidence filing.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing personal bond and two local sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to specific conditions.

Vishal Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 58

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48080 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Vishal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Verma,Akansha Verma

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant- Vishal with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 530 of 2022, under Sections 392, 411 I.P.C., Police StationAkbarpur, District- Kanpur Dehat, during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. It is further submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR. The allegations, which are imposed upon the applicant are false, forged, baseless and has not been supported by any authentic and legal evidence. There is no independent eyewitness of the alleged incident. It is also submitted that there is no direct or indirect evidence against the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 06.08.2022.

¶9

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but he could not dispute the factual submissions as urged by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Considering the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused, material/evidence brought on record, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment as well as the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, let the applicant involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶16

Order Date :- 4.11.2022 SK Srivastava

¶17

Digitally signed by SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.11.09 11:23:50 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vishal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Arshad Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Lodhi Vs State of U.P.

Kalim Vs State of U.P.

Naveen Vishvakarma Vs State of U.P.

Javed Vs State of U.P.