Allowed

Asgar Ali v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Nov 2022BAIL/46605/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge order grants bail to Asgar Ali in a criminal case involving alleged cow slaughter and animal cruelty. The court held it to be a fit case for bail considering co-accused were released and the possibility of trial conclusion was bleak, imposing specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on personal bond and two reliable sureties subject to specific conditions regarding court attendance and presence.

Asgar Ali Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 92

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46605 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Asgar Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Safiullah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.282 of 2014, under Section 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act and 11 Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, Police Station- Gunnor, District-Sambhal.

¶7

As per FIR version, it is alleged that on 08.08.2014, when the police personnel were was patrolling on duty have recovered 07 buffaloes, 12 padiyas and 02 cows from a container of the applicant.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime due to ulterior motive. It is further submitted that the applicant has been implicated by the Police by showing false recovery of animals. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. There is no independent witness to the said recovery. Prosecution evidence does not connect the applicant with the alleged offence. He further submits that the applicant has criminal history of three cases to his credit in which he has already been enlarged on bail. It is further submitted that the coaccused Akbar Ali has already been enlarged on bail by the court below. Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the applicant having better case for getting bail on account of parity. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. It is also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being released on bail, he may flee from the course of law or may, otherwise, misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is in jail since 19.09.2022 and the possibility of conclusion of trial in near future is very bleak.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail, but he has not disputed the above contention made by the

¶10

learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in mind that co-accused have already been released on bail and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail.

¶12

Let applicant- Asgar Ali , be released on bail in the aforesaid Case Crime Number on his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

¶13

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and learned Court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 1.11.2022 Shiv

¶19

Digitally signed by SHIV KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2022.11.01 15:57:53 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Asgar Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asgar Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shubham Varnwal Vs State of U.P.

Aslam Vs State of U.P.

Manvendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Sanjeet Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Angad Maurya Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Akmal and Another Vs State of U.P.