Allowed

Anees v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Nov 2022BAIL/45407/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted bail to Anees charged with offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 411, 413, and 414/34 for theft and forgery. Bail allowed on personal bond with two sureties subject to four specific conditions regarding court attendance and prohibition of fleeing.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties of like amount subject to four conditions regarding court appearance and conduct.

Anees Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 92

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45407 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Anees Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kripa Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.0129 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 411, 413, 414/34 of IPC, Police StationKundarki, District - Moradabad.

¶7

As per the contents of First Information Report, the applicant along with other co-accused persons was apprehended by the police and recovered several stolen motorcycles from their possession.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime due to ulterior motive. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant and the name of the applicant has come into picture in the confessional statement of the main co-accused Adil. It is further submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal history to his credit. It is further submitted that the co-accused Uvaish has already been enlarged on bail by another Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.09.2022, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.35675 of 2022. Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the applicant having better case for getting bail on account of parity. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. It is also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being released on bail, he may flee from the course of law or may, otherwise, misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is in jail since 08.06.2022 and the possibility of conclusion of trial in near future is very bleak.

¶9

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail, but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in mind that co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail.

¶11

Let the applicant- Anees be released on bail in the aforesaid case on his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

¶12

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and learned Court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 9.11.2022 SK Goswami

¶18

Digitally signed by SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI Date: 2022.11.09 13:50:13 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anees v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anees v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vineeta Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Verma Vs State of U.P.

Sangram Singh Vs State of U.P.

Vipin Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Lalita Vs State of U.P.

Qayyum Vs State of U.P.