The Supreme Court or High Court rejected a second bail application as infructuous, noting that the first application was rejected nearly three years prior and no valid interest remained for the applicant.
Bail application dismissed on the ground that it became infructuous due to significant delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43913 of 2021
Applicant :- Naresh Mandal Opposite Party :- Union of India Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Krishna Agarawal
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
This is the second bail application.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
First bail application was rejected on 28.09.2020. More than two years have passed. In efflux of time it appears application would have become infructuous, therefore, applicant has no interest in the case
Accordingly, second bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 5.12.2022 Sanjeet
Digitally signed by SANJEET KUMAR YADAV Date: 2022.12.06 10:56:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Naresh Mandal
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
