Allowed

Aslam v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Oct 2022BAIL/40356/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a bail application filed by Aslam in a disease-related case under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The court rejected arguments that the FIR was fabricated but granted bail subject to strict conditions regarding court attendance and no adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two local sureties subject to conditions of attendance and no adjournment.

Aslam Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 90

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40356 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Aslam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Sunder Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State as well as perused the material on record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant-Aslam with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in C ase Crime No. 167 of 2022, under Sections 3/5/8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and 11 ( ठ ) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, Police Station-Khakhreru, District-Fatehpur, during the pendency of the trial.

¶7

It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the present first information report lodged by the Police is nothing but a bundle of lie and the same has been lodged only for exploiting the applicant by indulging his name in a fake, false and frivolous case. The entire prosecution story as unfolded in the first information report is absolutely a self-made story projected by the informant. Next argument is that the alleged recovery of 100 kilograms beef is planted one by the Police. There is no independent witness of the said recovery. There is also no report of any Forensic Science Laboratory on the basis of which it can be said that the alleged recovery of meet is of beef. Apart from the above, the applicant is 60 years of age and suffering from old age diseases. The applicant has no criminal antecedents to his credit except the present one. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 4th August, 2022.

¶8

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but he could not dispute the factual submissions as urged by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Considering the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release the accused under the U.P. Gangster Act and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 , material/evidence brought on record, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties as well as the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Versus State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 , let the applicant involved in aforesaid case crime be

¶10

released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶16

(Shiv Shanker Prasad, J.)

¶17

Order Date :- 10.10.2022

¶18

Sushil/-

¶19

Digitally signed by SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.10.11 09:53:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Aslam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aslam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Vs State of U.P.

Sami Khan Vs State of U.P.

Aarif Vs State of U.P.

Mehtab Vs State of U.P.

Abhilesh Paswan Vs State of U.P.

Faisal Vs State of U.P.