Rishu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge court granted bail to applicant Rishu in a criminal case alleging theft of vehicles, despite some criminal history, subject to sureties and conditions for appearance and conduct during trial.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties each of like amount subject to specified conditions regarding appearance and conduct.
What the court decided
Court No. - 92
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39065 of 2022
Applicant :- Rishu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amrita Kashyap,Shams Uz Zaman Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.109 of 2021, under Section 41/411, 413, 414, 473/34 IPC, Police Station- Kasiya, DistrictKushinagar.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime due to ulterior motive. As per the FIR, it is alleged that the applicant along with other co-accused has stolen the 4 motorcycles and one electronic auto rickshaw, which false and fabricated. It is further submitted that police has recovered only one motorcycle bearing No.UP 57 AW 2256 from the possession of the applicant. It is next submitted that except the present case, applicant has four criminal history to his credit, which has been explained in para 11 to the affidavit to the bail application and in all the cases, the applicant has been granted bail, copies whereof have brought on record as Annexure 2 to the bail application. It is also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being released on bail, he may flee from the course of law or may, otherwise, misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is in jail since 19.02.2022 and the possibility of conclusion of trial in near future is very bleak.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether applicant Rishu is eligible for bail in Case Crime No. 109 of 2021 despite false implication allegations.
Whether conditions are required to ensure applicant appears in trial and does not misuse bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rishu
Coram
Gajendra Kumar
Shivakant Goswami
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/39065/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court