In a bail application regarding an attack on the informant arising from a property dispute, the High Court reviewed medical reports showing serious injuries and rejected the claim of lack of specific role. Consequently, the Court refused to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Bail application rejected; no enlargement on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38761 of 2022
Applicant :- Sanjayj Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Srivastava,Jagat Pal Singh,Sandeep Kumar Singh,Vinay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shyam Surat Shukla
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Ravi Shankar has also suffered contusion and abrasion over Rt. side of back and face.
person and his submissions appears to be reasonable; that in such circumstances, it is not possible for the person being assaulted to keep an accurate count of each of the blow given by each of the accused person.
Order Date :- 7.12.2022 Bhanu
Digitally signed by BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.12.09 18:29:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant under sections 147, 149, 323, 427, 504, 506, 308 I.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjayj Kumar Yadav
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
Bhanu Pratap Kushwaha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
