Imran v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant, Imran, was granted bail in a case under the NDPS Act involving alleged recovery of Alprazolam. The court found no criminal antecedents and allowed bail despite opposition by the State.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail by executing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount.
What the court decided
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36931 of 2021
Applicant :- Imran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava,Sachchida Nand Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard over bail application moved by the applicant, Imran, in Case Crime No. 1522 of 2021, under Sections-8/21 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station-Sahibabad, District-Ghaziabad.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA representing the State. Perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 21.07.2021; he is of no criminal antecedent; the alleged recovery of 110 Grams Alprazolam is little above than the commercial quantity of 100 Grams; It is a planted recovery with no independent public witness; no such recovery was there; no compliance of Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act is there; there is no likelihood of applicant's fleeing from course of justice or tempering with evidence in case of release on bail; hence bail has been prayed for.
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed bail but could not oppose this fact that the applicant is of no criminal antecedent.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail is maintainable in a case involving offences under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act, 1985.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Imran
Coram
Ram Krishna Gautam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/36931/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court