Allowed

Parvez Alam v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Sept 2022BAIL/35991/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed bail application for the applicant, Parvez Alam, involved in an offence under Sections 420, 379, 411 IPC, directing release on personal bond with two sureties, subject to specific conditions to ensure cooperation in trial and non-interference with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation and non-interference.

Parvez Alam Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35991 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Parvez Alam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandhya Singh,Kapil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.373 of 2022, under Sections 420, 379, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahr, during pendency of trial.

¶7

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case; the applicant is taxi driver. He has been arrested on the information given by the informant; false and planted recovery of Rs.28,000/- has been shown from the possession of applicant; no test identification parade has been conducted; after arrest of the applicant, police has implicated him in three other cases. Moreover, there is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 23.06.2022 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the mandate laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant, Parvez Alam, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶11

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶12

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶13

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 2.9.2022 Meenu

¶16

Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.09.06 10:01:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Parvez Alam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvez Alam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohini Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Arif Vs State of U.P.

Naseer Khan @ Bhure Vs State of U.P.

Abhishek Singh Vs State of U.P.

Iqbal Vs State of U.P.

Chandoo Sharma Vs State of U.P.