Allowed

Mohd Shakir @ Sakib @ Teepu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Aug 2022BAIL/32759/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The criminal miscellaneous bail application was allowed. The High Court held that the applicant had made out a case for bail based on the facts and circumstances, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case, and granted release subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties, subject to conditions regarding tampering with evidence and appearing for trial.

Mohd Shakir @ Sakib @ Teepu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 49

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32759 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Mohd Shakir @ Sakib @ Teepu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Roy Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant in Case Crime No.149 of 2022, under Sections 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Bhelupur, District Varanasi with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶7

It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It was submitted that there is no material against the applicant to invoke the provisions of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act. It was further submitted that in gang chart, three cases have been shown against applicant, in which, he is already on bail, copies of which have been annexed as annexure-3 to 5 to the bail application. It was further submitted that applicant is languishing in jail since 08.01.2022 and that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Mohd Shakir @ Sakib @ Teepu in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties to the satisfaction of court concerned subject to the following conditions:

¶11

(1). The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence during the trial.

¶12

(2). The applicant will not influence any witness.

¶13

(3). The applicant will appear before the trial Court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶14

(4). The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an application before this Court seeking cancellation of the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 22.8.2022 Mohit

¶17

Digitally signed by MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.08.23 12:01:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd Shakir @ Sakib @ Teepu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Shakir @ Sakib @ Teepu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aameen Vs State of U.P.

Jitendra Vs State of U.P.

Gulzar @ Kallu Vs State of U.P.

Lalbahadur Vs State of U.P.

Virendra Vs State of U.P.

Shahjad Vs State of U.P.