Allowed

Shakti Singh @ Monu Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Jul 2022BAIL/31648/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application where the applicant, charged under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Prevention Act, alleged false implication and false imprisonment. The court considered the larger mandate of Article 21 and directed the release on bail with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount with specific conditions.

Shakti Singh @ Monu Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31648 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Shakti Singh @ Monu Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Preeti Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Shakti Singh @ Monu Singh, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 56 of 2022, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Newadiya, DistrictJaunpur, during pendency of trial.

¶7

According to the gang chart the applicant is said to has been involved in two criminal cases wherein he is on bail. The applicant alleges false implication in the present case due to police rivalry. He is languishing in jail since 29.5.2022.

¶8

Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶9

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶10

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶11

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶12

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶13

Order Date :- 26.7.2022 Atul kr. sri.

¶14

Digitally signed by ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.07.26 17:11:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shakti Singh @ Monu Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shakti Singh @ Monu Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anish @ Bholu Vs State of U.P.

Jeut Rai Vs State of Up.

Daksh @ Darshan Vs State of U.P.

Yasveer Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Kashyap Vs State of U.P.

Ram Naresh Vs State of U.P.