Vikas Singh and Another v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for bail dismissed as infructuous since the Hon'ble Supreme Court granted interim bail and is seized of the matter. No substantive decision was required below.
Application for bail dismissed as infructuous since the Hon'ble Supreme Court granted interim bail and is seized of the matter. No substantive decision was required below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31643 of 2022
Applicant :- Vikas Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Birendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out. The learned counsel for the applicants is not present.
The case has been listed on several occasions but the learned counsel for the applicants has not appeared on any dates.
Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, the learned AGA states that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has granted interim bail to the applicants by means of an order dated 30.09.2022 passed in SLP No. 8998 of 2022 after taking into consideration the fact that the applicants have deposited an amount of Rs. 35 lacs to establish his bonafide, the interim bail has been granted to the applicants for a period of six months in order to explore the possibility of making payment to depositors and the matter has been directed to be listed after a period of six months.
Since the Hon'ble Supreme Court is already seized of matter after granting interim bail to the applicant, nothing remains to be decided by this Court.
The application has become infructuous due to the Hon'ble Supreme Court having granted interim bail to the applicants and being seized of the matter already.
In view of the aforesaid situation, the instant application is rejected as having become infructuous .
It goes without saying that in case of any subsequent developments, the rejection of the instant application having become infructuous would not affect the rights of the applicants.
Order Date :- 24.11.2022 Jaswant
Digitally signed by JASWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.11.24 17:45:22 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
SLP No. 8998 of 2022Referred¶7
Vikas Singh
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court