Talib v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30105 of 2022, Court No. 74 allowed bail for the applicant Talib in a case involving sections of IPC. The court found sufficient grounds for bail without expressing an opinion on the merits.
What did the court decide?
The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30105 of 2022
Applicant :- Talib Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Gupta,Himanshu Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Awadhesh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
List revised.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 252 of 2022, registered under Sections 354, 504, 506, 354-A, 354-B, 354-D, 294 IPC, Police Station-Garhmukteshwar, District- Hapur during pendency of the trial.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The allegation in the FIR is that on 31.5.2021 when the daughter of the applicant Saba Praveen was coming home from the college, the applicant had molested her and when she opposed the applicant abused her and threatened her not to tell anyone about this.
It is further argued that there is no witness of alleged incident and there is major contradiction in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Talib
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/30105/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court