Ashok Kumar Patel v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
A bail application was dismissed because the applicant did not press the matter before the court, despite having filed it directly.
A bail application was dismissed because the applicant did not press the matter before the court, despite having filed it directly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29467 of 2021
Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Patel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Verma,Ganesh Shankar Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjeev Patel,Vinod Kumar Patel
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Brijesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjeev Patel, learned counsel for the opposite party and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present bail application has been filed directly without applying before the Session Judge. He does not want to press the same.
In view of the above the present bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 11.5.2022 Neetu
Digitally signed by NEETU SINGH Date: 2022.05.14 11:42:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Patel
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court