It is further argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that he is shown to be the Chief Executive Officer of the company but he was not involved with the company in any way. He is neither Chief Executive Officer nor holding any post in the company. There was no company's account in his name. He never deposited or withdrew any amount from the accounts of the company. He has not taken benefit from the company rather he is the victim of the company as his real brother had invested Rs. 17 - 20 lacs in the company and when he demanded this money, he has been falsely implicated by the officers of the company. It is also argued that the Investigating Officer concerned sought information from the banks. The given information clearly shows that no bank account of the company is being operated by him. Thus, he being the innocent person has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ill will of the informant. He has not misappropriated the money of the investors. It is also argued that he was also implicated in another false case of the same allegation being Case Crime No. 89 of 2019 under Sections 406, 420, 409, 120-B, 174-A I.P.C. Police Station EOW, District Delhi and in that case, he has been
