Allowed

Ram Chandra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Sept 2022BAIL/26834/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail application under Sections 323, 308 IPC, the single-bench court allowed the applicant's prayer to be released on bond and two sureties subject to standard conditions prohibiting tampering with evidence and engaging in further criminal activity.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or commit further crimes.

Ram Chandra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 74

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26834 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ram Chandra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghubir Singh,Somdev Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Singh Kushwaha

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Ram Singh Kushwaha, learned counsel for the informant; Sri Munna Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.273 of 2021, under Sections 323, 308 I.P.C., P.S. Khandauli, District Agra, during pendency of trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to enmity. There is a cross case between the parties and both parties have received injury. General role has been assigned to the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history. Moreover, there is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future. The applicant is languishing in jail since 31.05.2022 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another , passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant, Ram Chandra, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties

¶11

be verified.

¶12

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶13

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 15.9.2022 Meenu

¶17

Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.09.17 12:39:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Chandra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Chandra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Dada Ram Vs State of U.P.

Pawan Kumar Gautam Vs State of U.P.

Reetu Singh Vs State of U.P.

Shiv Shankar Vs State of U.P.

Suhail and Another Vs State of U.P.