Allowed

Intzar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Aug 2022BAIL/26803/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge granted bail to Intzar, an applicant implicating false accusation by police in a case under U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Act, 1986, citing Article 21 and a Supreme Court dictum, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond and two sureties conditional upon non-tampering with witnesses, sincere cooperation in trial, and no new criminal activity.

Intzar Vs State of U.P. — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26803 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Intzar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Farid Ahmed Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Intzar, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 165 of 2022, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police StationNakhasa, District- Sambhal, during pendency of trial.

¶7

According to the gang chart the applicant is said to has been involved in two criminal cases wherein he is on bail. The applicant alleges false implication in the present case due to police rivalry. He is languishing in jail since 25.4.2022.The applicant has criminal history of one case which has been explained in paragraph-8 of the bail application.

¶8

Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶9

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶10

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶11

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶12

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 1.8.2022

¶13

Atul kr. sri.

¶14

Digitally signed by ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.08.02 12:24:11 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Intzar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Intzar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharik Vs State of U.P.

Vikas Nishad @ Gore Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rajesh @ Pappu Vs State of U.P.

Bobby Vs State of U.P.

Rahish Vs State of Up.

Naeem @ Nanhae @ Danna Vs State of U.P.