Rahul @ Fantu v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26109 of 2020
Applicant :- Rahul @ Fantu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Govind Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Counter affidavit filed today, is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
The second bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.254 of 2018, under Sections 354B, 376 and 511 of IPC and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act, Police Station-Kotwali Kannauj, District -Kannauj.
Learned counsel for the applicant does not propose to file any rejoinder affidavit and he proceeded argument on merits. When query was made as to what is new ground for enlarging the applicant on bail, he failed to point out the same. Therefore, the present bail application is hereby rejected.
Order Date :- 22.9.2022 JSP
(Piyush Agrawal, J.)
Digitally signed by JAY SINGH PATEL Date: 2022.09.23 14:27:36 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted on second application without new grounds.
Rahul @ Fantu
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court