Allowed

Devendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Oct 2022BAIL/2546/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the High Court granted release to the applicant, alleging false implication in a dowry death case under Sections 498-A IPC and 304-B IPC, subject to furnishing bond and undertakings regarding attendance and cooperation with the trial process.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like amount, subject to specific conditions of attendance and undertaking.

Devendra Singh Vs State of U.P. — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 64

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2546 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Devendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shrawan Dwivedi,Indra Jit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant is the husband of the deceased and has not committed the offence in question. It is next contended that the applicant is doing the business of glass and the brother of the deceased has taken some material from the applicant on credit and when the applicant asked for the money from the deceased then she annoyed and committed suicide. It is next contended that prior to the present FIR no such complaint was ever made either by the deceased or her family member. It is next contended that the first information report of the alleged incident is delayed for which no plausible explanation has been given. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 13.9.2020. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie

¶9

satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another , reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶10

Let the applicant Devendra Singh involved in Case Crime No.864 of 2020, under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Naubasta, District Kanpur Nagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶17

Order Date :- 12.10.2022 Dev/-

¶18

Digitally signed by DEV PRAKASH Date: 2022.10.15 13:21:20 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Devendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abu Salim Vs State of U.P.

Abdullah Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Omprakash Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Vimla Devi Vs State of U.P.

Vishnu Prajapati Vs State of U.P.

Ashok Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others