Baijnath v. State of U.P.

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25069 of 2017 Applicant :- Baijnath Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Rao,Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Naveen Kumar Yadav,Navin Kumar Yadav

Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.

None present except counsel for the State.

A list of 528 matters are listed before the undersigned today which falls in the category of Criminal Revision, Criminal Bail and Criminal Misc., 482. The office has verified that these cases have become infructuous and the purpose of filing the same would no longer survive.

This is one of the matters which are segregated by the Computer Division in the heading that matters have become infructuous as the trial is already over.

This matter has outlived its purpose. The reason being the matter was filed when the trial was pending, but now the trial has either culminated into acquittal/conviction and the office has submitted that appeal has been preferred for challenging the same.

In that view of the matter, this matter is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated.

However, to be on safer side, if the counsel, who represent the petitioners or the respondents, have any grievance, they may file a note within four weeks from today for revival of this matter, if the cause still survives and has been wrongly mentioned in the caption.